Sunday, October 28, 2007

Blog 2: Solitude vs Loneliness

Solitude vs Loneliness: What is the difference between solitude and loneliness? Describe with reference to examples from your own life, people you know, and well-known others.

Abstract
Being alone can lead to either loneliness or solitude. A person’s reaction to being alone, that is whether they experience loneliness or solitude, can change each time they experience aloneness. Loneliness, unlike solitude, can also occur when people are not alone. Loneliness is a self-perceived state in which a person’s network of relationships is either smaller and or less satisfying than desired. Solitude is a satisfying state of being alone where an individual provides themselves with sufficient company. Loneliness can produce many negative consequences whereas solitude has largely positive effects. Learning to appreciate spending time with one self is the most effective way to reduce loneliness. All human beings need some periods of solitude. People do, however, vary greatly in the amount of aloneness they feel comfortable with.

Introduction
Humans are social and cultural beings (Rosenblum, 2007). In the past people who lived and worked in groups were more likely to be able to fight of enemies when searching for food, to have the strength to protect their home and each other from intruders. Those in groups were therefore more likely to survive. Evolution, as a result, has led to people now preferring to go through life in groups. Humans now live, work, travel and do most other things in groups (Buchholz, 1998). Importantly though, people do need to be able to spend some time alone (Clarke, 2005). Being alone, or aloneness, involves physical separation or isolation from all other human beings (Black, 2003). A quiet fear of being alone has developed amongst people today (Mendelson & Yeshiva, 1990). However, more and more people are living, travelling and dining alone (Rosenblum, 2007). Some of these people chose to engage in these experiences alone in order to satisfy their personal needs and spend time in their own company. Others feel they have no alternative. Thus, aloneness can be chosen or it can be forced upon an individual. This choice, or lack there of, is a significant predictor of whether aloneness results in loneliness or solitude for any given individual (Brown, 1998). Loneliness is forced upon people and has many negative consequences. Solitude is a voluntary retreat from the company of others and is beneficial in many ways (Marano, 2003). It is important to note however, that being alone does not always produce the same stable characteristic of either loneliness or solitude. A person’s reaction to being alone can change each time they experience aloneness. That is, in one situation an individual may feel extremely lonely due to isolation from others, however, this same individual may feel a great sense of enjoyment and solitude when alone in an alternative situation (Rokach, 2000).

What is Loneliness
Each human being falls somewhere along a spectrum of comfort in being with themselves and others. Some people enjoy being alone, and for a large amount of time, whilst others are terrified of the same scenario (Rosenblum, 2007). Loneliness generally occurs when the amount of time spent alone exceeds an individual’s personal comfort. Loneliness is a negative state marked by a sense of isolation. It is the painful awareness that one lacks close and meaningful contact with others (Black, 2003). Marano (2003) stated loneliness is a harsh punishment, a deficient state, a state of discontent and an awareness of excess aloneness. Being isolated from other people is a likely though not essential component of loneliness.

It is possible to be surrounded by people and still feel lonely (Jones, 1981). Loneliness in this case, results from the depth of social interaction rather than the amount. When a person feels they do not have enough meaningful relationships they become lonely (Brown, 1998 ). Marilyn Munroe was a well known model, actress and singer who was admired and envied by many. She is a prime example of being lonely without being alone. Despite the majority of her life being spent in the public eye, constantly surrounded by large crowds, fans and the media, Marilyn suffered from extreme loneliness. She had three failed marriages and complicated relations with her family (Henry, 2007). Marilyn longed for more meaningful relationships. Even a person who has quite a few close relationships can suffer from loneliness if they desire additional relationships. Consequently, loneliness can be defined as a self-perceived state in which a person’s network of relationships is either smaller and or less satisfying than desired (Jones, 1981).

What is Solitude
Both the need to be alone and to socialise with others are essential to human happiness and survival (Buchholz, 1998). Solitude is the state of being alone without being lonely (Marano, 2003). It is the capacity to cope positively with time spent alone and the ability to enjoy inward quietness (Hollenhorst, Frank & Watson, 1994). Solitude is a desirable state of being alone where an individual provides themselves with sufficient company (Black, 2003). Buccholz (1998) recognised that sleep is nature’s way of ensuring solitude. During the solitude of sleep the unconscious mind is able to process and unravel problems. Solitude is required to figure out puzzles, events and situations, to generate new discoveries and to discover unique answers. A friend of mine, Helen, deeply recognises the benefits of solitude. If given the choice she sleeps in all morning, not as a result of tiredness or depression, but in an effort to maintain the peacefulness of sleeping or just lying in bed undisturbed. Though Helen works in a public setting, she spends a large amount of her free time alone. Helen is completely capable of enjoying her own company and does not often feel lonely.

Differences between Loneliness and Solitude
From the outside loneliness and solitude can look a lot alike (Marano, 2003). The state of aloneness is often the same whether an individual is suffering loneliness or enjoying solitude. The difference lies in the person’s attitudes, perceptions and appraisals of this aloneness (Black, 2003). Loneliness occurs when the aloneness is attributed to not having anyone to spend time with or to enjoy each others company. Loneliness is a fear of aloneness. On the other hand, solitude results when the person enjoys this time spent alone (Karnick, 2005; see Appendix A for a photographic representation of the difference between loneliness and solitude). Notably, aloneness is a necessary condition of solitude whereas loneliness can occur with or without it (Hollenhorst et al., 1994). The consequences, of loneliness and solitude also differ. Loneliness can produce many negative consequences whereas solitude has largely positive effects (Hollenhorst et al., 1994).

Negative consequences of Loneliness
Loneliness has a negative impact on many aspects of human life. Mother Theresa believed the most prevalent disease that the world faces is not cancer but rather loneliness (Aquino, 2003).Loneliness can be detrimental to mental health as well as overall quality of life (Karnick, 2005). Chronically lonely people tend to suffer from a viscous cycle, beginning with low self-esteem leading to loneliness which then further reduces self-esteem (Brown, 1998). Furthermore, loneliness has been linked to depression, anxiety, interpersonal hostility and, in extreme cases, to suicide (Hansson, Jones, Carpenter & Remondet, 1986 cited in Rokach, 2000). Marilyn Munroe was believed to have suffered from severe depression. Sadly her lifestyle of fame and fortune was not sufficient to combat her loneliness, in fact it likely contributed to it. In the end Marilyn’s depression led to her, suspected suicidal, death at the young age of thirty-six (Henry, 2007).Loneliness has also been found to produce an increased vulnerability to physical health problems, such as heart disease (Rosenblum, 2007). Especially when paired with stress, loneliness can weaken the immune system leading to health deterioration. Malnutrition, weight loss or gain, fatigue and drug and alcohol dependency are also often associated with extreme loneliness (Brown, 1998). I remember a boy I once knew, when I was a child, who was never really able to make friends. He always seemed sad and alone. Years later I now hear he is still unable to sustain friendships and has turned to drugs for companionship, they make him feel happier. However, in the long run this negative path will likely increase his sense of loneliness rather than reduce it.

Positive consequences of Solitude
Spending time alone in solitude is extremely beneficial. It helps to develop a strong sense of self and the ability to distinguish personal thoughts, feelings and judgements from those of others (Clarke, 2005). Solitude is an opportunity for reflection, personal growth and development, self-realisation and self-discovery (Hollenhorst et al., 1994). It enables people to regulate and adjust their lives, to be aware of and satisfy their deepest personal needs, feelings and impulses (Buchholz, 1998). Relaxation can be achieved in solitude by using the time to block out hectic schedules and to relieve external pressures (Clarke, 2005). Solitude is necessary for many leisure activities that produce enjoyment and satisfaction such as reading a book, meditating and gardening (Marano, 2003). My friend Helen, who finds great satisfaction in solitude, enjoys to read, to listen to music and to go hiking in her alone time. Solitude also facilitates bereavement, mourning and prayer (Hollenhorst et al., 1994). Solitude is refreshing for the body and soul (Marano, 2003).

One of the most recognised benefits of solitude is its ability to stimulate the creative mind (Hollenhorst et al., 1994; Marano, 2003). Bucholz (1998) noted that the most creative teenagers were those who valued solitude. Indeed, many artists, poets and writers prefer to work in isolation from distractions and other people to allow for optimal performance from their creative minds (Goldberg, 1989). Claude Monet a famous painter from the 1800’s was especially fond of solitude. In fact he often captured the essence of solitude in his paintings of nature (see Appendix B for some of Monet’s famous paintings). He sat in solitude for hours, if not days, embracing the company of his paints and the environment that surrounded him. In addition, he enjoyed to garden, which promotes a sense of solitude also (Gifford, 2007).

Concept map displaying differences between loneliness and solitude as well as positive and negative consequences


Suggestions for reducing loneliness and benefiting from solitude
The ability to profit from solitude requires a sense of self that can survive in the absence of immediate social reinforcement (Long, Seburn, Averill & More, 2003). Learning to appreciate spending time with one self is the most effective way to reduce loneliness (Clarke, 2005). Utilising activities that can be completed alone which are of interest to the lonely individual, perhaps gardening, taking walks, painting, exercising or building things, is a promising method of achieving this. Engaging in activities that both fill in time, that would have otherwise been spent alone, and that encourage social interaction is also beneficial (Buchholz, 1998). Participating in group activities where cooperation with others is required to achieve the desired end result of the task and where members of the group provide strong encouragement to each other will aid in reducing loneliness (Brown, 1998). Possible examples include joining a class where collective learning is promoted, joining a gym or starting a new hobby which involves interaction with other people. Social skills training may prove valuable to some who suffer loneliness due to their inability to interact effectively with other people.

Conclusion
In summary, solitude and loneliness both result from aloneness. Loneliness is a negative self-perceived state marked by a sense of isolation (Jones, 1981). In contrast, solitude is a positive state of being alone where an individual provides themselves with sufficient company (Black, 2003). Aloneness is a necessary condition of solitude but loneliness can occur with or without being alone. Loneliness can lead to serious mental and physical illness (Brown, 2007; Hansson et al., 1986 cited in Rokach, 2000; Brown, 1998). Solitude aids in personal growth and development, relaxation and awareness of personal needs. Solitude restores body and mind, loneliness depletes them (Marano, 2003). Loneliness can be reduced by learning to appreciate one’s own company (Clarke, 2005). All human beings need periods of solitude. People do, however, vary greatly in the amount of aloneness they need and feel comfortable with (Rosenblum, 2007).

(Word Count: 1468)



References

Aquino, P. (2003). Lesson from experience: A disease called loneliness. Update, 67(7), 406-407.

Black, J. (2003). The difference between solitude and loneliness. Retreived October 7, 2007, from http://www.singlescafe.net/solitude.html

Brown, E. (1998). ‘Tis the season to be jolly—But not for the lonely. Medical Update, 22(6), 6.

Buchholz, E. (1998). The call of solitude. Psychology Today, 31(1), 50-57.

Clarke, R. D. (2005). Spend time solo. Black Enterprise, 36(3), 173.

Gifford, K. (2007). Claude Monet – Biography. Retreived October 15, 2007, from http://www.humanitiesweb.org/human.php?s=r&p=a&a=i&ID=826

Goldberg, A. (1989). The virtues of being alone. PsycCRITIQUES, 34(11), 1043-1044.

Henry, C. (2007). Marilyn Munroe. Retreived October 15, 2007, from http://www.filmreference.com/Actors-and-Actresses-Ma-Mo/Monroe-Marilyn.html

Hollenhorst, S., Frank, E. & Watson, A. (1994). The capacity to be alone: Wilderness solitude and growth of the self. International Wilderness Allocation, Management, and Research, 234-239.

Jones, W. H. (1981). Loneliness and Social Contact. The Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 295-296.

Karnick, P. M. (2005). Feeling Lonely: Theoretical Perspectives. Nursing Science Quarterly, 18(1), 7-12.

Long, C. R., Seburn, m., Averill, J. R. & More, T. A. (2003). Solitude experiences: Varieties, settings, and individual differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 578-583.

Marano, H. E. (2003, August 25). Solitude vs loneliness. Psychology Today. Retrieved October 5, 2007, from http://psychologytoday.com/articles/index.php?term=pto-2965.html

Mendelson, M. D. & Yeshiva, U. (1990). Reflections on loneliness. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 26(2), 330-355.

Rokach, A. (2000). Perceived causes of loneliness in adulthood. Journal of Social Behaviour & Personality, 15(1), 67-84.

Rosenblum, G. (2007). Alone or Lonely? Clovetwo. Retrieved October 5, 2007, from http://clovetwo.com/articles/story.asp?file=/2007/10/19/reallives/20071019110835&sec=reallives

Appendices

Appendix A
A photographic representation of the difference between loneliness and solitude

See: http://janespsychpage.blogspot.com/2007/10/representations-of-solitude-and.html

Appendix B
A few of Monet’s famous paintings

See: http://janespsychpage.blogspot.com/2007/10/monet-capturing-essence-of-solitude.html

Appendix C
Self Assessment of Blog

Theory and Research
I did not find any specific theories directly relating to loneliness and solitude in my research. For this particular blog topic, however, I did not feel that a specific theory was necessary anyway. The question asked for the differences between loneliness and solitude to be explained and I think this was sufficiently done with support from previous research, without the need for a theory. A considerable amount of information was available on this topic. I could have written more about who suffers and why they suffer from loneliness, such as the elderly, and the type of person who relishes in solitude, but due to the required small size of the blog, I tried to limit myself to only including research that focused directly on the difference between loneliness and solitude. I also felt it was important to recognise the positive and negative consequences of these characteristics and to mention a few ways, that were supported by research, to reduce loneliness and to benefit from solitude.

I also incorporated personal examples of loneliness and solitude to illustrate the concepts more clearly. I mentioned an experience of both loneliness and solitude from people that I have encountered in my life. I also thought Marilyn Munroe and Claude Monet, who are well known by all, were good representatives of loneliness and solitude. I thought using well known people would enable readers to recognise the stories and make it easier for them to then understand the difference between loneliness and solitude.

Written Expression
An abstract was included at the beginning of the blog to make it clear to readers what the blog was going to discuss. I tried to implement meaningful sub headings to distinguish between sections and to make the blog easier to read, as this was an area that was identified as needing improvement from my first blog. A concept map was included to provide a diagrammatic view of the main points of the blog. This should help readers to understand how loneliness and solitude develop and why two given people in similar situations can end up with two completely different outcomes and consequences.

Readability statistics showed a Flesch-Kincaid Grade level 12 and a Flesch Reading ease of 28.1. The Flesch reading ease is low, however it is a higher result than my first blog which indicates I have improved, at least slightly, on the expression of my ideas. This result is pleasing as I did consciously focus on reducing the length of my sentences and paragraphs.

Online Engagement
My online engagement was improved significantly in the second part of the semester. I made 7 postings on my blog page (increasing from 1 in the first part of semester) which covered social psychology topics including the use of media in spreading important messages, the movie Blood Diamond which captures many relevant themes of social psychology as well as loneliness and solitude. I also made a number of thoughtful comments on other peoples blog pages. The comments revealed my opinions on a range of topics. I also added a poll to my blog page to see how students feel when they are isolated form other people. I feel I should have participated in more online engagement still, but at least I improved. I enjoyed the online engagement a lot more toward the end of semester, I think it just took me a little too long to get used to it.

These are links to my posts and comments from the second part of semester:
Posts on my blog page

http://janespsychpage.blogspot.com/2007/10/monet-capturing-essence-of-solitude.html

http://janespsychpage.blogspot.com/2007/10/basic-blog-plan.html

http://janespsychpage.blogspot.com/2007/10/representations-of-solitude-and.html

http://janespsychpage.blogspot.com/2007/10/late-poll.html

http://janespsychpage.blogspot.com/2007/10/solitude-vs-lonlelinesswhats-difference.html

http://janespsychpage.blogspot.com/2007/10/thanks-james.html

http://janespsychpage.blogspot.com/2007/10/effective-media-use.html

Comments on others blog pages

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7499764905859280365&postID=8089918408024728576

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3480035210475226729&postID=3093895172326173628

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8552559758393911997&postID=6360522819365869787

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8300280778050537299&postID=7634875439166595556

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8841261988306058751&postID=2837325489295172266

Monet: capturing the essence of solitude




Saturday, October 27, 2007

Basic Blog Plan

My topic for blog 2 is 'What is the difference between solitude and loneliness? Describe with reference to examples from your own life, people you know, and well-known others.'

So I thought I would just outline the basic plan and structure of my blog.

1. Introduction - which will talk about being alone and how it can lead to solitude or loneliness.
2. What is Loneliness
3. What is Solitude
4. Differences between Loneliness and Solitude - using various people as examples to illustrate
5. Possible concept map displaying the main differences between loneliness and solitude
6. Positive and Negative effects of Loneliness and Solitude - again using various people as examples
7. I may also include some ways of reducing loneliness and benefiting from solitude
8. Conclusion

If anyone has any further suggestions please let me know.

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Representations of Solitude and Loneliness

Loneliness
Solitude

Late Poll

Hi everyone

I have added a late poll to my blog page and would appreciate any responses from anyone who has the time between studying for exams and preparing Blog 2.
Thanks

Solitude vs Lonleliness...whats the difference??

Solitude and Loneliness are the focus of my second blog.



I though as a starting point, for some basic background on the topics, I would see what Wikepedia has to say:



Solitude of a person means seclusion or isolation, i.e. lack of contact with other people. It may stem from deliberate choice, contagious disease, disfiguring features or repulsive personal habits, or circumstances of employment or situation.



Short-term solitude is often valued as a time when one may work, think or rest without being disturbed. It may be desired for privacy.



Loneliness is an emotional state in which a person experiences a powerful feeling of emptiness and isolation. Loneliness is more than just the feeling of wanting company or wanting to do something with another person. Loneliness is a feeling of being cut off, disconnected and alienated from other people. The lonely person may find it difficult or even impossible to have any form of meaningful human contact. Lonely people often experience a subjective sense of inner emptiness or hollowness, with feelings of separation or isolation from the world.


Solitude differs from that of loneliness. Where loneliness is a seperation from showing a lack of connectedness with others and a sense of deperation as one looks within their soul. Solitude can bring a warm sense of peace and serenity to your inner self. Solitude comes with self-confidence. It allows one to apply their faith and love in a higher being to appreciation of their own human qualities. The core of solitude is in the qualities of humility and compassion. Where lonliness is a seperation from others, solitude is an inner connection with God. Lonliness is never chosen where as solitude is a choice. An example can be seen in monks. They regard long-term solitude as a means of spiritual enlightenment.


A distinction can be made between physical and mental seclusion. People may seek physical seclusion to remove distractions and make it easier to concentrate, reflect, or meditate. However, it's not the end in itself and once a certain capacity to resist distractions is achieved, people become less sensitive to distractions and more capable of maintaining mindfulness and staying inwardly absorbed and concentrated. Such people, unless on a mission of helping others, don't seek any interaction with the external physical world. Their mindfulness is their world, at least ostensibly.


Symptoms from externally imposed isolation often include anxiety, sensory illusions, or even distortions of time and perception. Young humans tend to adapt better to isolation than older humans do.



It can be seen clearly from these extracts from Wikepedia that there is a considerable difference between solitude and lonliness, centering around how the indivdual appraises being alone or isolated.

Im sure we all have people in our lives who love to spend time alone and feel a great deal of solitude and others who hate to be alone and feel a great desire for more contact with others and for that contact to be more meaningful.

Thanks James

wooow James!!! Crazy speed on getting the exams marked and results back to us.

Thanks for your efficiency. Its really nice to know what your results are and how well you did whilst the exam is still fresh in your mind.

Thursday, October 18, 2007

Effective Media Use

Hi guys

I recently watched the movie Blood Diamond, which for those of you who dont know is a relatively new movie set in the midst of Sierra Leone's 1999 civil war.

During the brutal civil war in Sierra Leone from 1991 to 2002, the Revolutionary United Front forced civilians to work in diamond mines, then found ways to smuggle the gems to Europe and America, where they were bought with money that made its way back to the rebels.

The movie illustrates some of the disturbing torture and bloodshed that occured over diamond mining and the value that was placed on the rocks. Child soldiers and brutal rebel forces were great in number and power.

Blood Diamond got me thinking... why do we not use the media more frequently to expose issues such as these??

The media is a great way to influence a great proportion of people in a short amount of time. The more people that know about important issues, such as these, the more they will do about it.

Although ignorance is no excuse, it is convenient!! When people are forced to notice things that need changing or people who need help, they will feel more responsible to help.

I think movies are an especially effective means of getting the messages across. Veiwers really get to understand the situation. I know when I watch a movie I often almost feel as though I am part of the movie, like I am there in the situation myself. You can really get a great understanding of the story.

The use of media can provide great education and exposure of important issues. Any support that can be generated, whether that be financial support, medical aids, commuity awareness, decreasing stereotypes or prejudice reduction (depending on what the issue is) could make large differences in the lives of many poeple.

I do think the proportion of movies and media exposure being dedicated to more important issues rather than trivial themes is increasing currently but I think it would be beneficial to see this proportion rising even further.

Any thoughts or comments are welcome

Saturday, September 1, 2007

Blog 1: Stereotypes of Aboriginal Australians and chronic alcoholism.

Stereotypes of Aboriginal Australians and chronic alcoholism.

Stereotypes are cognitive beliefs concerning the characteristics, attributes and behaviours of members of specific groups. Negative stereotypes regarding race, gender and religion, amongst other categories, have received considerable attention from researchers due to the significant effect they have on an individual’s social perceptions and behaviours (Rowlands & Lee, 2006). There are numerous negative stereotypes held in Australian society. The various stereotypes of Aboriginal Australians are overwhelmingly negative (Hill & Augoustinos, 2001). The belief that Aboriginal Australians are chronic alcoholics is one particular stereotype of major concern (Donovan & Leivers, 1993). Stereotypes are formed and learned through social categorisation and in-group favouritism. They exist due to ignorance and mental short cuts which humans use to simplify the process of thinking about other people. This often involves large overgeneralisations of the beliefs and behaviour of people in negatively stereotyped groups, contributing to the formation of out-group homogeneity bias (Baumeister & Bushman, 2008). The stereotype regarding Aboriginal Australians as chronic alcoholics is maintained through blaming societal problems on the stereotyped group consequently enhancing negative attitudes toward the group, as the scapegoat theory postulates, also by a perceived sharedness of belief in the stereotype when interacting with other human beings and via confirmation bias (Baumeister & Bushman, 2008; Clark & Kashima, 2003). Negative stereotypes can be changed by increasing knowledge and education about the minority group, by presenting and communicating stereotype disconfirming information, through consciously overriding cognitive stereotypical attitudes and by increasing exposure to and contact with the stereotyped group (Gee, Khalaf & McGarty, 2007; Hill & Augoustinos, 2001).

Alcohol is a reasonably recent introduction to the long history of stereotypical attitudes towards Aboriginal Australians (Kamien, 1996). Hunter (1992) reported that two commonly encountered beliefs of Australian people are that all Aboriginals are drinkers and that all Aboriginal drinkers are drunks. These stereotypes are incredibly dominant despite non-drinkers constituting a larger proportion of the Aboriginal population in Australia. In fact, prevalence figures indicate there are a higher percentage of Aboriginal non-drinkers than non-drinkers of the wider Australian population (Hunter, 1990). A major concern however, is that those Aboriginals who are drinkers are likely to be consuming alcohol at harmful levels. This is reflected in the high level of social, psychological and health related problems (Hunter, 1992).

How stereotypes are formed and why they exist

Stereotypes are formed as a result of social categorisation and in-group favouritism. Social categorisation refers to sorting individuals into groups on the basis of some common characteristic (Baumeister & Bushman, 2008). Following social categorisation, in-group favouritism generally occurs. In-group favouritism is the tendency to give preferential treatment or more positive attitudes towards one’s own group (Zebrowitz, Bronstad & Lee, 2007). This usually leads to advocating less favourable attitudes or stereotypes toward other groups. Accordingly, the majority of stereotypes are negative in nature (Augoustinos, Ahrens & Innes, 1994). Social categorisation allows for stereotypes to develop of the entire group rather than having to process large amounts of information concerning every individual. These stereotypes exist to represent the group as a whole as well as any individuals connected to the group. This process allows for stereotypes to be used as heuristics, or mental shortcuts, which limits the amount of effort and energy expenditure that is required to think about other people. Information can be obtained via the group stereotype rather than an individual encounter with each member (Baumeister & Bushman, 2008). Unfortunately, using stereotypes often results in large overgeneralisations of people within the group. Out-group homogeneity is a term that describes the tendency to overgeneralise and regard all members of other groups as having much the same characteristics, to a much greater extent than they actually do (Zebrowitz et al., 2007). This is precisely the problem facing Aboriginal Australians in that they are largely overgeneralised as chronic alcoholics. In truth, this label represents only a limited percentage of the group. Stereotypes may also exist to assist in topics of ignorance. People who have little, or no contact, with other groups have minimal information about them and may attempt to overcome their lack of knowledge by forming stereotypes (Baumeister & Bushman, 2008). In short the existence of stereotypes simplifies the world and the process of thinking.

How stereotypes are maintained

Negative stereotypes are particularly durable (Pedersen, Griffiths, Contos & Bishop, 2000). A variety of factors contribute to their maintenance. The scapegoat theory is one possible contributor. It describes the inclination of human beings to hold minority groups responsible for a large amount of societal problems. This then contributes to further negative associations with the group (Baumeister & Bushman, 2008). Aboriginal Australians are often blamed for violence, crime and poverty. People also have an inclination to only select and consider information that is consistent with the stereotype they have developed about a minority group. This tendency is referred to as a confirmation bias. Humans seek out information that affirms their stereotypical view of Aboriginals as alcoholics and often discredit or ignore information that suggests otherwise (Pedersen et al., 2000). A perceived sharedness of belief in the stereotype has also been found to influence the strength of negative attitudes. Clark and Kashima (2003) stated that knowing a social stereotype is shared or not shared with others affects attitudes and behaviours toward members of the stereotyped group. Expression through communication is the fundamental element in determining whether a stereotype is shared or not. People are much more likely to express stereotype relevant and consistent information, such as talking about alcoholism amongst Aboriginals which significantly contributes to the maintenance of the stereotype, if they are aware that the beliefs are shared with the individual or group they are communicating with (Lyons & Kashiam, 2006). Stereotypes are much easier to form and maintain than they are to change.

How to change a stereotype

Stereotypes are highly resistant to change (Hill & Augoustinos, 2001). However there are various means that can be employed to reduce negative stereotypes. This particular stereotype, viewing Aboriginal Australians as chronic alcoholics, could be changed by educating others and presenting stereotype disconfirming information to other humans. There are currently a number of specific programs developed in Australia designed to educate and provide information that increases awareness, understanding and knowledge in the community and that counteracts widely held false beliefs with reference to Aboriginal Australians and their culture (Gee et al., 2007). Such programs include The Applied Prejudice Reduction Intervention and The Cross-Cultural Awareness Program (Hill & Augoustinos, 2001).Surprisingly, their have been mixed opinions concerning the effectiveness of these programs. Typically results tend to suggest the programs reduce prejudice and negative stereotypes initially as well as significantly increasing knowledge (Gee et al., 2007). However, Hill and Augoustinos (2001) emphasize that three months after completion of such programs, whilst knowledge about the target group and related social issues remains considerably higher than baseline levels, negative stereotypes tend to increase once more. Positive communication is another tool that should be utilised in broadening the recognition of false beliefs that lead to stereotypes (Lyons & Kashima, 2006). The media and advertising could be made use of in portraying powerful messages to the public in order to generate discussion and modification of the misconception of Aboriginal Australians as chronic alcoholics (Donovan & Leivers, 1993). Conscious override, a method of mentally concentrating on overpowering embedded cognitive thoughts and attitudes toward stereotypes, should stem from this communication, and is a dominant additional mechanism in combating negative stereotypes (Baumeister & Bushman, 2008).The contact hypothesis also recognises the importance of providing stereotype disconfirming information.

The contact hypothesis aims to reduce ignorance and is the most influential social psychological method of decreasing prejudice and negative stereotypes (Hill & Augoustinos, 2001). It proposes that reduction of negative stereotypes can be achieved via intergroup contact. Stereotype disconfirming information can be observed and taken in by those involved in group interaction through increased exposure to Aboriginal Australians who do not represent chronic alcoholics (Baumeister & Bushman, 2008).Whilst contact and exposure to the stereotyped group has, under specific positive conditions, been demonstrated as a successful method of condensing negative stereotypes, it encompasses some limitations (Hill & Augoustinos, 2001). It is vital, for successful stereotype change, that the Aboriginals that are involved are perceived as being typical Aboriginal Australians and that the people in the group are of equal status of. If perceived as atypical Aboriginals the lack of alcoholism and chronic behaviours they exhibit will not be generalised to the broader stereotype of Aboriginal Australians, rather these individuals will be considered an exception to the rule (Baumeister & Bushman, 2008).

Conclusion

Aboriginal Australians are subject to a harsh and unrealistic stereotypes of being chronic alcoholics. Negative stereotypes, such as this, are formed through social categorisation and in-group favouritism. They exist to aid people in the processing of large amounts of information about the world and its people. The Aboriginal alcoholism stereotype is maintained through the continued ignorance, confirmation bias and the perceived sharedness of stereotypical beliefs. It is awfully difficult to counter negative stereotypes once they are developed. Education with stereotype disconfirming information, exposure and consciously overriding stereotypical thoughts, beliefs and attitudes are all possible methods that can be exercised in combating negative stereotypes. Aboriginal Australians are one minority group in Australian society that suffers from particularly cruel stereotypes. They remain subject to cultural exclusion (Hunter, 1990). The quality of life of many Australian people is being decreased solely due to their Aboriginal background. As a country known for its multiculturalism and freedom of expression, Australia and its people should be working to erase these debilitating stereotypes by any means possible.

(Word Count: 1443)

References

Augoustinos, M., Ahrens, C. & Innes, M. J. (1994). Stereotypes and prejudice: The Australian experience. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 125-141.

Baumeister, R. F. & Bushman, B. J. (2008). Social Psychology and Human Nature (1st ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

Clark, A. E. & Kashima, Y. (2003). Stereotype maintenance in communication: How perceptions of stereotype sharedness contribute to the stereotype content of interpersonal communication. Australian Journal of Psychology, 144(1), 108-113.

Donovan, R J. & Leivers, S. (1993). Using paid advertising to modify racial stereotype beliefs. Public Opinion Quarterly Volume, 57, 205-218.

Gee, A., Khalaf, A. & McGarty, C. (2007). Using group-based interaction to change stereotypes about people with mental disorders. Australian Psychologist, 42(2), 98-105.

Hill, M. E. & Augoustinos, M. (2001). Stereotype change and prejudice reduction: Short- and long-term evaluation of a cross-cultural awareness programme. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 11, 243-262.

Hunter, E. (1992). Aboriginal alcohol use: A review of quantitative studies. Journal of Drug Issues, 22(3), 713-731.

Hunter, E. (1990). Images of violence in Aboriginal Australia. Aboriginal Law Bulletin, 2(46), 12-18.

Kamien, M. (1996). Alcohol and drug problems in minority groups. Drug and Alcohol Review, 5(1), 59-61.

Lyons, A. & Kashima, Y. (2006). Maintaining stereotypes in communication: Investigating memory biases and coherence-seeking in storytelling. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 59-71.

Pedersen, A., Griffiths, B., Contos, N. & Bishop, B. (2000). Attitudes toward aboriginal Australians in cit and country settings. Australian Psychologist, 35(2), 109-117.

Rowlands, I. & Lee, C. (2006). Choosing to have children or choosing to be childfree: Australian students’ attitudes towards the decision of heterosexual and lesbian women. Australian Psychologist, 41(1), 55-59.

Zebrowitz, L.A., Bronstad, P.M. & Lee, h. K. (2007). The contribution of face familiarity to in-group favouritism and stereotyping. Social Cognition, 25(2), 306-339.


Appendices

Appendix A
Concept map of Stereotypes




Appendix B
Self Assessment of Blog

Theory and Research
I have used several theories relating to stereotypes in the blog. A brief description of each theory was given as I felt it was important to capture the key points from each theory. Due to the word limit however, I was unable to expand on many of these theories as much as I would have liked. I dedicated a large proportion of my research on how stereotypes can be changed as this was a main focus of the blog. I researched a decent amount of journal articles, books and internet sites to aid in writing the blog. However, further research could have been useful in the areas of forming and maintaining stereotypes.

Written Expression
APA style was adhered to for the most part. I found it difficult though. Because of the way we were to submit the blogs some formatting, such as indenting in the References, seems to have been lost. Headings throughout an essay are not generally APA format either but I used some headings to structure the paragraphs in a more reader friendly way. A concept map was also developed to illustrate the main points of the blog and show how the many different aspects of stereotypes link together. The concept map was intended to make the essay easier to follow.

Readability statistics showed a Flesch-Kincaid Grade level 12 and a Flesch Reading ease of 15.3. The Flesch reading ease is very low which suggests I need to work on the expression of my ideas in future. Perhaps reducing the length of my sentences and simplifying my words would be beneficial. In saying that, I felt a more simplified approach would not have captured the essence of many of the theories and ideas for this particular topic.

Online Engagement
The process of assessment and discussion using blogs is all very new to me. As I was not familiar with how it all worked I was unable to do many fancy postings. However, I was one of the people who started the discussion about the ghost of Rwanda documentary and was able to include a link to a useful webpage. I also began to make comments on other students’ blogs towards the end. My online engagement could definitely be improved and now that I am getting the hang of things that is what I intend to do. I plan to make more regular and valuable contributions to the discussions.

Blog 1 - Stereotypes in Australia

Although I am leaving it rather late. I thought I would post some of the ideas I am incorporating into my first Blog.

I have chosen topic #9 on Stereotypes. I am focusing on the stereotype of Aboriginal Australians being chronic alcoholics. This topic is of personal interest and importance to me as I know many people who suffer from the consequences of stereotypes of Aboriginal people in Australia such as this one.

I think overgeneralisation is a major problem with stereotypes that people need to consciously do something about in order to create a fairer country for everyone. Aboriginal peopple should not be discriminated against or rejected due to their backgrounds. All people should be given equal opportunity to make the most of life.

Some Aboriginals do have alcoholism problems, as do others, but we should not be stereotyping them we should be helping them. This stereotype certainly does not represent the entire population of Aboriginals in Australia and it is unjustified to say that it does.

I also have a concept map completed which I will post shortly.

Any comments or suggestions are welcome

I hope you are all doing well with your first blogs

Tuesday, August 14, 2007

Ghosts of Rwanda


Hi guys

Continuing on from Mike's post about whether you would help if another Rwandan genocide were to occur. I came across a discussion page on the internet which asks a similar question:

Does the phrase "never again" have more meaning today than it did ten years ago? If another Rwanda were to happen, do you think the world would respond differently this time?

I would like to think the world would respond differently, hopefully leading to a less devastating outcome. However it requires more than just thoughts to change the course of a genocide or similar shocking event.

I have added a link to the web site which displays opinions and discussion of the Rwandan Genocide.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/ghosts/talk/

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Just testing